The Last Templar

The Last Templar

Book - 2005
Average Rating:
3
Rate this:
Four masked horsemen, dressed as Templar Knights, make their way from Central Park to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. They do not stop at the steps, but steer the horses through the crowds gathered for opening of the museum's exhibition of Vatican treasures, scattering the great and the good of Manhattan society and storming through to the exhibition, collecting artefacts, opening gunfire on security and police, beheading a security guard with a broadsword. Among the melee, archaeologist Tess Chaykin observes the leader of the horsemen head for one piece in particular, observing the reverence with which he selects the object and utters words in Latin as he makes away with it. The four horsemen leave the stunned crowd and disappear into the urban nightscape of Manhattan. The FBI's investigation team is led by Sean Reilly, a practising Catholic, and involvement from the Vatican in the guise of De Angelo, a senior priest. an ancient decoding device used by the Knights Templar, Tess Chaykin becomes more than a witness to the event, and is drawn into the investigation by her professional knowledge which leads her to aid them in pursuing a former colleague, Vance, whose obsession is fuelled by the most personal of tragedies. She leads the team, and Reilly in particular, through the dark history of the crusading Knights and on a journey which takes herself and Reilly through the sewers of New York, over continents to the barren Turkish coastline, and from there to the highest point of command at the Vatican, culminating with a dramatic sea chase amid a fierce storm. As Tess is compelled by curiosity and a critical desire for archaeological truth, so her growing relationship with Reilly plunges him into spiritual and professional conflict, the legacy of which is the secret for which the original Knights Templar were persecuted and tortured. Vance's desperate wish for its revelation threatens to shake all modern religions to the very core, leaving Reilly and Tess with the burden of this truth.
Publisher: London : Duckworth, 2005.
ISBN: 9780715634417
0715634410
9780525949411
0525949410
Branch Call Number: F Khou
Characteristics: 350 p. ; 24 cm.

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

r
RebelBelle13
Mar 12, 2018

I really, really wanted to like this book. I love reading about the history of the Catholic church, and all things Knights Templar. This was obviously riding the coattails of The DaVinci Code- which is one of my favorites. Khoury saw how popular Brown's works were becoming and went, "Hold the phone, I can write something exactly like that, but worse." The book reads like a screenplay to an action movie, which is undoubtedly what he had in mind when writing it. The novel starts out with a museum heist, a few murders, and then archaeologist Tess and FBI agent Riley are swept up in the history of the Knights Templar and searching for their lost treasure. It tries to hit every Brown beat- the fish out of water who needs a history lesson, a complex code that can only be cracked if you have the right key, the Vatican's diabolical involvement, hand to hand combat, literal cliffhangers, and the plot twist at the end. As much as I enjoyed the exposition and history lessons (the only saving grace here, really) they weren't enough to replace the repetitive phrases (frowned inwardly was used at least a dozen times) the two-dimensional characters and the all-too-obvious 'please make me into a movie, this will be awesome to see on the screen' action sequences. (You know what I'm talking about.)
I'd like to go into the ending here, so, SPOILER ALERT.
Tess was anti-church and anti-religion the entire book. She had been an archaeologist for years, wanting to find and preserve items for the betterment of the world and for a decent grasp of history. After finding the Templar treasure, she attempts to destroy it, not once, but TWICE. What kind of archaeologist would do such a thing? Vance is painted as crazy, driven to the edge by the loss of his wife and daughter, and yet he acted more rationally and more believably than Tess did the entire book. Tess is focused on revealing to the world the Templar treasure (which is revealed to be the testement of Jesus Christ, proving that he was human, not a supernatural figure) at the beginning, and only at the end changes her mind because she was treated kindly by two people. REALLY? The entire novel, she is complaining how much death and suffering christianity has placed upon the world since its inception, and how she wants to change that, and then she does a 180 in the last 30 pages. She wants to destroy it, or hide it, because she doesn't want to upset people's delusions. Sweetheart, first of all, you are being ridiculously selfish. How can you keep the biggest discovery of the last 2000 years to yourself? You can't even have the book tested for its verity, or have people decide for themselves what they think of it? How dare you.
Not only that, after 500 pages of running around, and history lessons, and dozens of people dying (I'm not joking) we find out that the journal of Jesus is a FAKE, manufactured by the Templars to discredit the church and break up Christianity. If I had been reading an actual copy of this book, I would have thrown it across the room. As it was, when I was listening to the audiobook, I'm sure the neighbors could hear my string of curses.
Leave this one where it is, folks. It's not worth reading. All it makes me want to do is go back and reread The DaVinci Code.

j
Johndixon
Dec 12, 2014

An awful book. If you grock the difference between "dubious" and "skeptical" or "their" and "they're", this book will infuriate you. The author operates at a grade 6 competency. Avoid.

d
dirtbag1
Jun 23, 2012

Another in the Templar genre, well written, and an easy read with one large downside. I was hoping the two main 'good guy' characters, Tess the archaeologist and Sean the FBI agent could work together without having to 'fall in love' when solving their problems. The conclusion is also a bit weak. It assumes that without religion there is for many people no way to survive life. It is like saying a person cannot swim without a life preserver on.

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at DCPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top